AI visibility, measured

What ChatGPT, Gemini, and Google AI Overviews
actually say about your brand.

AI is unbundling search. Brands that aren't surfaced — by ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews — fall out of the consideration set silently. GEO Operator measures it across six engines, diagnoses why, generates the fix, ships it via Git, and proves the lift on re-test.

8
Brands audited
2 / 6
Answer engines wired live
11
Audit runs in the store
522
Individual probes recorded

Who it's for

🚀

B2B SaaS & dev tools

AI referral traffic to B2B SaaS is already 2.8%–15% — the highest of any category. Get cited where buyers actually research.

🏢

Growth & content teams

Stop guessing whether your content is in the answer. Measure with confidence intervals, prove lift after every change.

🎯

Agencies

Multi-workspace, white-label-ready. Run audits and ship strategies for a portfolio of clients from one platform.

The closed loop

Every other tool stops at monitoring. GEO Operator closes the loop: it ships the fix and proves the lift.

01

Measure

Probe each engine N times; record retrieved → cited → mentioned with Wilson 95% CIs.

02

Diagnose

Detect retrieval gaps, mention-without-citation, weak prompts, and per-engine disparities.

03

Generate

Produce a publish-ready content brief + FAQ JSON-LD + outreach target list + worldview corrections.

04

Publish

Ship the artifact straight to your content repo (Git commit or PR), full provenance kept.

05

Re-test

Re-audit and prove lift — significance flagged only on non-overlapping CIs, not on noise.

Live case studies

Real measured data, refreshed on every deploy. See the full ranking in The AI Visibility Index →

📐
Live case study

Linear

Project management Medium risk

Universally mentioned by AI, but rarely cited — recommended via third-party listicles, not Linear's own pages.

90%
Mentioned
6%
Cited
0%
Retrieved

See the full audit →

📊
Live case study

PostHog

Product analytics Medium risk

AI's top-of-mind brand in product analytics — mentioned 96% of the time, #1 share of voice. Citation rate still varies sharply by engine (38% on Claude vs 8% on OpenAI).

96%
Mentioned
23%
Cited
8%
Retrieved

See the full audit →

🔷
Live case study

Jira

Project management Medium risk

The incumbent. Universally known and recommended, but increasingly framed by AI as the heavy, complex option teams migrate away from.

92%
Mentioned
10%
Cited
4%
Retrieved

See the full audit →

🔴
Live case study

Asana

Project management High risk

A work-management heavyweight AI knows well — but often framed as 'not dev-native', surfacing less for engineering-specific queries.

44%
Mentioned
0%
Cited
0%
Retrieved

See the full audit →

🟣
Live case study

ClickUp

Project management High risk

The 'one app to replace them all' play. Strong AI mention rate, but the all-in-one breadth dilutes its dev-specific authority.

56%
Mentioned
27%
Cited
6%
Retrieved

See the full audit →

🟢
Live case study

Monday

Project management High risk

A marketing-heavy 'Work OS' AI recognizes broadly — but for engineering queries it's often flagged as not dev-specific.

42%
Mentioned
23%
Cited
27%
Retrieved

See the full audit →

Live case study

Notion

Project management High risk

Beloved workspace, but for issue-tracking queries AI often relegates it to a 'flexible but not purpose-built' aside rather than a top pick.

33%
Mentioned
0%
Cited
0%
Retrieved

See the full audit →

🟠
Live case study

Shortcut

Project management Medium risk

Frequently named in AI answers as a Linear/Jira middle-ground — but the 2021 Clubhouse rename still muddies how engines describe it.

75%
Mentioned
25%
Cited
23%
Retrieved

See the full audit →

View the full Index →

Six engines, one funnel

Same uniform retrieved → cited → mentioned funnel across every engine. Where engines disagree, the play is platform-specific — and our diagnosis flags it automatically.

Claude · Sonnet + WebSearchOpenAI · gpt-4o + Responses web_searchGemini · 2.0-flash + google_search groundingPerplexity SonarGoogle AI OverviewsBing / Copilot

Pricing

Start with a free audit. Pricing kicks in only when we're moving the numbers.

Free audit
$0 / one-shot

See exactly where your brand stands in AI answers — no card, no commitment.

  • One-shot audit on your top buyer-intent prompts
  • Probed across our live engines (Claude + OpenAI)
  • Retrieved / Cited / Mentioned + Wilson 95% CIs
  • Share-of-voice vs your competitors
  • Top cited domains in your category
  • Delivered as a hosted report within 24h
Get the free audit
GEO Operator
$199 / month

We keep your AI visibility climbing — measured, fixed, and proven monthly.

  • Everything in the one-time audit
  • Re-audited every month, automatically
  • Run-over-run lift reports (with significance)
  • Fresh content brief + fixes each cycle
  • Publish straight to your content repo
  • Email support — cancel anytime
Start monthly — $199

See full plan details →

Honest framing

AI referral traffic is still < 1% of total web traffic globally. The disruption isn't in volume yet — it's in distribution: who gets named in the answer, and who gets dropped silently. CTR on answer-overview queries drops ~50%, the informational middle is hollowing out, and the leading metrics are platform-specific. Acting now is cheap; acting later is expensive.

Read the methodology →

Audit your brand in 24 hours.

First run is free. We'll send the report by email.